Usability Testing

See What Users Do. Hear Why They Did It.

AI-moderated walkthroughs on Figma prototypes, staging and production sites. A one-line snippet shows the moderator where users clicked and stalled, so it asks why in the moment. Panel results in 24 hours.

From $150/study
Panel results in 24 hours
4M+ vetted panel
Researcher using User Intuition AI-moderated research platform
Interview preview Voice
AI interviewer

Walk me through the last time you made this choice. What tipped it?

Recording 11:42
AI insight

The deciding reason surfaced four follow-ups deep, not in the first answer.

Every finding links to the recording

Trusted by teams at

Capital One
RudderStack
Nivella Health
Turning Point Brands
Procter & Gamble
Microsoft
CHG Healthcare
TL;DR

A usability testing platform is software that captures how real users navigate a product or prototype — and why they get stuck. User Intuition runs AI-moderated usability walkthroughs on Figma prototypes, live URLs, or any web product, with the AI moderator asking follow-up questions in real time as participants click, hesitate, or rage-quit. On builds you control, a User Intuition session snippet gives the moderator element-level detail: which control was clicked, where the mouse moved, and where the participant stalled. Unmoderated tools log behavior but skip the reasoning; moderated platforms add a human observer but require recruiting and scheduling. User Intuition captures both behavior and reasoning in a single session — starting at $30 per quality interview, with results in 24 hours from a 4M+ vetted panel across 58 countries, interviewing in 80+ languages. The output is practical: a navigable session record with spoken commentary aligned to each interaction, friction patterns across participants, and the specific moments where mental models diverged from the product's design intent.

At a glance

What is usability testing with User Intuition?

Usability testing with User Intuition puts real participants on your Figma prototype, staging or production site while an AI moderator asks why at the moment they hesitate. On builds you control, a one-line session snippet tells the moderator which element was clicked and where the participant stalled, and every session returns a recording. Run 200+ panel sessions in 24 hours from a 4M+ vetted panel across 58 countries, or bring your own users, whose sessions run in parallel as they respond.

Who is usability testing with User Intuition for?

Research and UX agencies testing client products at sprint cadence, and in-house product, design and UX research teams who need the reasoning behind each click.

How does AI-moderated usability testing work?

Share a Figma prototype link or live URL, with no plugin or special export needed. Participants navigate on their own desktop while the AI moderator asks follow-up questions in real time, in voice, or in video if you want to see their face.

What do you get from a usability test?

A navigable recording with spoken commentary aligned to each interaction, friction patterns across participants, the element-level click path on snippet-enabled builds, and an editable presentation.

The problem, and how we fix it

Why does unmoderated usability testing miss the why?

Unmoderated tools log clicks without reasoning; moderated sessions need scheduling most teams can't sustain at sprint cadence. Here's what UX researchers tell us, and how User Intuition closes each gap.

  1. Sound familiar?

    Maze shows us where people dropped off. Nobody can tell me why they ignored the button.

    Real-time AI follow-up on every hesitation

    The moderator asks about a hesitation, backtrack or rage click while it's still fresh, capturing behavior and reasoning in the same session, which unmoderated tools like Maze, Sprig, Hotjar and UserTesting's unmoderated tier never record.

  2. Sound familiar?

    Every moderated session means two weeks of calendar wrangling, so we default to unmoderated.

    Moderated usability testing without scheduling

    Participants join on their own time, with none of the calendar coordination or per-session contracts of Lookback, Userlytics or UserTesting's moderated tier, and panel results arrive in 24 hours.

  3. Sound familiar?

    We keep testing with the same customer panel, and they've learned every workaround.

    Outside users, real mental models

    Sessions go to participants who don't already know your product, screened to your target profile and recruited from a 4M+ vetted panel in 80+ languages, so you test against the mental models of your next users, not people who have learned the workarounds.

  4. Sound familiar?

    The synthetic users breezed through the flow. Real customers got stuck on step two.

    Real participants, not simulated users

    Every session is a real person on their own device and in their own context, and the recording shows they engaged, so the friction you find is friction that exists in production.

How It Works

From Prototype to Friction Patterns in 4 Steps

Paste a Figma link or live URL, define tasks, and get behavior-plus-reasoning evidence, with panel results in 24 hours.

1
5 min

Connect Your Prototype or URL

Paste a Figma prototype link or live URL. Define the tasks you want tested. Select your target audience from a 4M+ vetted global panel — by role, segment, behavior, or geography. Bring your own guide, or the AI builds the screener and walkthrough script automatically.

2
Instant

Participants Walk Through Live

Real users join on their own time and navigate your product naturally. The AI moderator asks follow-up questions in real time as they click, hesitate, or comment — capturing reasoning at the moment of friction.

3
24 hrs (panel)

Behavior + Reasoning Captured

Each session returns a navigable recording with spoken commentary aligned to the moment it was said, plus AI-extracted friction tags. Sessions running the snippet add the element-level click path. Cross-session analysis surfaces where multiple users hit the same wall.

4
Ongoing

Friction Patterns in the Intelligence Hub

Findings feed your Customer Intelligence Hub — searchable across sessions, with cross-test friction patterns and mental-model gaps surfacing as the catalog grows.

Walkthrough Modes

Test Any Digital Product Surface

Real users walk through Figma prototypes, live URLs, or web products — the AI asks why in real time so you get behavior and reasoning in one session.

Figma Prototype Walkthroughs

Paste a Figma prototype link and participants navigate it on their own device while the AI moderator asks why in real time. Classic prototypes run on Figma's player and capture click and page-visibility signal; Figma Make compiles to code and takes the session snippet.

Test prototypes before engineering spend, with the reasoning behind the clicks

Live URL Walkthroughs

Test production sites, staging environments, or any URL-accessible web product. Participants navigate naturally; the AI captures behavior and reasoning across the actual user environment.

Real-environment usability data — not lab settings or sandbox sims

Real-Time AI Follow-up

Unlike unmoderated tools, the AI moderator asks follow-up questions as users interact — what they expected, why they hesitated, what the label suggested. Reasoning captured at the moment of friction, not reconstructed afterward.

Behavior plus reasoning in one session — no second round needed

Real Participant Environment

Sessions run on the participant's own desktop, in their own environment — not a lab setting. Captures the real-world distractions, multitasking, and context that controlled environments hide.

Friction surfaced where users navigate the product

Element-Level Clickstream

Add the User Intuition snippet at setup and the moderator follows the session live: which element was clicked, where the mouse moved, what was scrolled past, where the participant stalled. Follow-up questions land on the exact control that caused the friction, not a vague recollection.

Questions that name the exact element, not a vague "what happened there?"

Sites That Block Embedding

Banks, publishers, and most logged-in products send headers that stop third-party tools embedding them. User Intuition runs those as recorded walkthroughs on the real production site, so the study happens against the product users use.

Test the live product, not a staging clone or a screenshot stand-in
Methodology & Trust

Real-Time AI Follow-up Methodology

Most usability testing tools either log clicks (unmoderated) or require human observers (scheduled). User Intuition combines real-time AI follow-up with a vetted human panel — capturing behavior and reasoning in a single session, at sprint cadence.

How User Intuition Runs Walkthroughs

  • Real-time AI follow-up — asks why during interaction, not after
  • Navigable session recordings with spoken commentary, plus element-level click path on snippet-enabled builds
  • Friction-pattern detection across participants — where multiple users hit the same wall
  • Mental-model gap surfacing — where design intent diverged from user expectation
  • Cross-session analysis in the Customer Intelligence Hub — patterns over time
  • Real participant environment — own desktop, own context, not a controlled lab setting

Built-In Quality Controls

  • Panelists vetted and tracked longitudinally; every session screened for AI-generated or coached answers
  • Attention and engagement monitoring throughout every session
  • Professional respondent filtering across all panel sources
  • Evidence trails for every friction finding — cite the exact moment
  • Methodology transparency: see why the AI asked each follow-up
  • GDPR & CCPA compliant; customer data is never used to train AI models

Methodology validated across 30,000+ AI-moderated sessions. Real-time follow-up — not a survey after the session ends.

Why User Intuition

Why researchers choose User Intuition

User Intuition is an AI-moderated interview platform that gives research teams and agencies the depth of a senior researcher at the scale of a survey, with vetted respondents, your own methodology and evidence you can trace to the verbatim. Quality is built in: a person vets every panelist by hand, every session is screened for fraud, and you pay only for interviews that pass.

Senior-researcher depth

The moderator ladders 5–7 levels deep by default, using Reynolds and Gutman's laddering method, so you hear the reasons behind the reasons.

5–7 levels by default

Your methodology, run as written

Bring your discussion guide and frameworks. Required questions stay pinned in order, word for word if you need it, study rules keep the moderator inside your compliance lines, screeners and hard quotas fill every cell to plan, and you decide how far it probes.

Your guide, your probing

Every finding traces to its source

Click any theme through to the verbatim, the transcript and the recording. Every claim in the deliverable traces to what a participant said.

Quote → transcript → recording

Respondents you can stand behind

A 4M+ vetted panel across 58 countries: a person listens to every panelist's interviews before they're accepted, then every session is screened for AI-generated or coached answers and panelists are tracked across studies. Or bring your own: customer lists, your panel provider, or respondents straight from your survey.

Vetted by hand, tracked over time

Deliverables ready to present

Themes, verbatims and an editable presentation for every study, plus every transcript, recording and screener answer to export into your own tools. Put your own brand on them when you need to.

Editable deck, report, transcripts

Survey scale, quality-only billing

200+ panel interviews in 24 hours, with no cap on parallel conversations. Each one is scored on length, depth and coverage, and you pay only for those that pass.

200+ panel interviews in 24 hours
  • Isolated workspaces
  • Confidential stimulus
  • Never used to train AI models
  • GDPR & CCPA compliant
  • SOC 2 Type II examination underway
  • Security →
Compare

How does User Intuition compare to Maze and UserTesting?

User Intuition pricing is the current self-serve rate; subscription options are on /pricing/.

Dimension User Intuition Maze UserTesting
Methodology AI-moderated walkthroughs with real-time follow-up Unmoderated task-based testing Mix: unmoderated + moderated humans
Turnaround 24 hours for panel studies Hours (unmoderated only) Days-weeks (moderated)
Real-time follow-up AI asks why during clicks None — preset task prompts only Only in moderated sessions
Behavioral instrumentation Element-level clickstream with the snippet, live to the moderator Click paths, reviewed after the session Screen recording only
Recruiting Built-in 4M+ vetted panel BYO panel or partner add-on Their panel (US/UK-leaning)
Best for Diagnostic + reasoning at scale Quant click-path data Enterprise contracts + brand-validated panels
Sample Research

Hear the interviews. See the presentation.

Explore calls and a sample presentation from our 43-participant Walmart shopper study.

W10
10 min

Grocery top-up, supercenter

“Basically, because we use those things all a lot We try to always have you know, certain things in the house at all times because we use them very frequently. So we don't like to run out of them.”

Routine top-upOne-stop shopperPrice aware
W30
14 min

Phone replacement, unplanned and urgent

“It made me feel so safe so relieved, and it brightened my day.”

Urgent replacementStaff-assistedNew to the area

Sample presentation

Preview three slides, or download the full 15-slide presentation.

Title slide: How Walmart shoppers decide. 43 shoppers, 7.6 hours of interview, 34 who hit an obstacle, 36 who will return anyway.

1 / 3How Walmart shoppers decide

Download PDF

Bring your own sample

$30 per quality voice interview

Use our 4M+ vetted panel

$60 per quality voice interview

Customer stories

What researchers say

"We ended up testing four screens and a concept image for a shared-lists idea that design was falling in love with. Fourteen video interviews later, we paused the build and saved a sprint on something people didn't connect with."
Vincent M., Project Manager, Mid-Market Verified review on SourceForge
"I still use quick unmoderated tests for task metrics. User Intuition is better for understanding the reasons behind those metrics. Using both made the redesign much easier to defend."
Mary M., Project Manager, Mid-Market Verified review on SourceForge
FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

A usability testing platform is research software that captures how real users navigate a digital product — typically through tasks, scenarios, or open exploration. User Intuition is a usability testing platform that runs AI-moderated interactive walkthroughs on Figma prototypes, live URLs, or any web product, capturing both click behavior and spoken reasoning in real time.

UserTesting offers both unmoderated and human-moderated tiers. The unmoderated tier is similar to Maze. The moderated tier uses human observers but requires recruiting and scheduling. User Intuition runs AI-moderated sessions with real-time follow-up at $150/study — the moderated depth without the human-observer overhead.

Unmoderated tests log behavior — clicks, completion rates, time-on-task — but never capture reasoning. Moderated tests add an observer (human or AI) who asks follow-up questions: what were you trying to do, why did you hesitate, what did the button look like it would do. Moderated tests capture the reasoning behind behavior; unmoderated tests assume you can infer it from the click path. User Intuition's AI moderator runs moderated sessions at unmoderated cost and speed.

Jakob Nielsen's classic finding is that 5 participants surface 80% of usability issues — but that assumes moderated, in-depth sessions. With User Intuition's AI moderator running real-time follow-up at $150/study, most teams run 5-20 sessions to surface friction patterns confidently and segment by user type. The Customer Intelligence Hub stores sessions across studies for longitudinal analysis.

Usability studies on the consumer panel return results within 24 hours of launch; sessions with your own users complete in parallel as they respond. Participants join on their own time across a 4M+ vetted global panel; the AI moderator runs sessions around the clock. Synthesis happens as sessions complete, with the final report available within hours of fieldwork ending.

Starting at $150/study (5 sessions at $30 each using your own audience). A 10-session study runs $300; 20 sessions = $600. With standard panel recruitment, sessions are $60 each. There are no platform fees on self-serve plans.

The best usability testing platform depends on the methodology you need. For quantitative click-path data on unmoderated tasks, Maze leads. For human-moderated sessions with brand-validated panels, UserTesting's moderated tier remains the enterprise default. For AI-moderated walkthroughs that capture behavior plus real-time reasoning at $150/study, User Intuition combines real-time follow-up with a built-in 4M+ vetted panel.

Yes, and it asks in the moment rather than from a script. When a participant hesitates, backtracks, or clicks the same control repeatedly, the moderator asks about that specific action while it is still fresh. A human moderator does the same thing, but one session at a time and on a scheduled calendar. User Intuition runs sessions in parallel, with panel studies back in 24 hours.

A traditional moderated session gives you reasoning, but each one needs a human moderator and takes weeks to schedule. Unmoderated tools are fast and cheap but return click data with no explanation. User Intuition runs moderated sessions at unmoderated scale, with real-time follow-up on every session, $30 per interview with your own users, and panel results in 24 hours.

Walkthroughs run at the standard voice rate, $30 per quality interview on Starter, or $60 with standard panel recruitment, with studies starting at $150. The video rate of $60 applies only if you want to record the participant's face as well as their screen. You are billed for quality interviews only.

The moderator's awareness depends on whether the study runs the session snippet. Without it, the moderator knows whether the page is in view and when clicks happen, including rage clicks. With the snippet, installed when you set up the study, it also knows which element was clicked, where the mouse moved, what was scrolled past, and where the participant stalled. Both paths return a session recording to you afterwards.

Figma hosts classic prototypes on its own player, so there is nowhere to install a session snippet; those run as walkthroughs with click and page-visibility signal. Figma Make compiles to real code at a URL you control, so it accepts the snippet and gives the moderator element-level detail. The same applies to Lovable, v0, Bolt, Vercel, and Netlify builds.

Yes. Sites that send X-Frame-Options or frame-ancestors headers — most banks, publishers, and logged-in products — cannot be embedded by third-party testing tools. User Intuition runs those as recorded walkthroughs against the real production site, so you do not need a staging clone or a screenshot stand-in.

Yes, on both the default and snippet paths. The recording is also how you verify the participant engaged with the product rather than clicking through to reach the incentive, one of the layers User Intuition uses to bill only for quality interviews.
See It in Action

Watch Real Users Walk Through Your Product

Book a demo to see an interactive walkthrough in action, or start free with 3 sessions. Panel recruiting is billed separately.

See it First

Explore a real walkthrough output — no sales call needed.

Self-serve

Launch your first walkthrough in minutes. Panel results in 24 hours.

No recruiting. No scheduling. No observation lab. Just real users, real reasoning, panel results in 24 hours.

Explore More

Related resources

Tools & Tactics

Practical frameworks and platform-specific guides for teams ready to act.

Reference Guides

Reference deep-dives on methodology, best practices, and applied research.

Alternatives & Comparisons

Side-by-side comparisons with competing platforms and approaches.

Related Solutions

Complementary research use cases that pair with this topic.

Industries

See how teams in specific verticals apply this research.

Last updated