Ship with confidence — validate decisions in hours, not weeks
Sprint cycles don't wait for research. User Intuition gives UX researchers AI-moderated depth interviews at $20 each — recruit, interview, and synthesize in 48 hours so evidence arrives before the design review, not after the feature ships.
Users abandon the onboarding flow at step 3 — not because of complexity, but because the value prop is unclear...
Trusted by teams at
UX researchers are caught between sprint pressure and research rigor. Recruiting takes weeks, usability tests capture surface-level task completion but miss the motivations underneath, and insights stay siloed in individual researchers' notebooks. User Intuition gives UX teams AI-moderated depth interviews at $20 each with results in 48 hours. Each conversation probes 5-7 levels deep into user motivations — why they hesitated, what they expected, what would make them trust the feature. Run 50-300 interviews per study, synthesize automatically, and build a searchable research repository the entire product team can query.
Your research can't keep up
— so teams ship without it
When research takes longer than a sprint, product teams stop waiting. Features ship unvalidated, and researchers become bottlenecks instead of strategic partners.
Sprint Pressure Kills Research Depth
Two-week sprints leave no room for 6-week research cycles. You're forced to choose between fast-but-shallow and rigorous-but-late. Neither serves the product well.
Usability Tests Miss the Why
Task completion rates and click paths show what users do, not why. A user completes the flow but doesn't trust the feature — and your usability test calls it a success.
Recruiting Is the Bottleneck
Finding 8-12 qualified participants takes 2-4 weeks. By the time you've recruited, the design has moved on. You're validating yesterday's decisions.
Insights Stay Siloed Between Researchers
Each researcher maintains their own synthesis docs. When a PM asks 'what do we know about onboarding friction?' nobody can answer without digging through personal files.
Concept-Stage Research Is Too Slow
You want to validate early — before engineering invests — but traditional research timelines push validation to post-build, when changing course is 10x more expensive.
Qualitative Depth Doesn't Scale
You can interview 8 users or survey 500 — but not both. The tradeoff between depth and scale forces you to compromise on evidence quality for every study.
How UX Researchers use
User Intuition
UX Research
Conduct deep qualitative research that fits sprint cycles. Understand user motivations, mental models, and unmet needs in 48 hours.
Product Innovation
Validate new product concepts and feature ideas before engineering invests. Test early, iterate fast, build what users actually need.
Concept Testing
Test wireframes, prototypes, and design concepts with 50-300 users. Get structured feedback on appeal, clarity, and usability before committing to build.
NPS & CSAT Deep Dives
Go beyond scores to understand why users rate you the way they do. Probe into satisfaction drivers, friction points, and loyalty motivations.
Win-Loss Analysis
Understand why users chose your product — or a competitor. Interview churned users and prospects to identify experience gaps that drive switching.
Consumer Insights
Understand user needs, behaviors, and decision processes at depth and scale. Build empathy across the entire product organization.
User Intuition vs.
traditional UX Researchers tools
| Dimension | User Intuition | Traditional UX Research Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Interview Depth | 30+ min · 5-7 laddering levels | 5-15 min task-based clips |
| Recruiting Time | Built-in · 4M+ panel, no sourcing | 2-4 weeks to find qualified participants |
| Turnaround | 48-72 hours recruit to insight | 3-8 weeks end-to-end |
| Cost Per Interview | $20 per conversation | $100-$300+ per participant session |
| Scale | 50-300+ depth interviews per study | 5-12 participants typical |
| Insight Type | WHY users behave — motivations, mental models | WHAT users do — task completion, click paths |
| Knowledge Base | Searchable intelligence hub across all studies | Individual reports, no cross-study search |
| Language Coverage | 50+ languages, same methodology | English-primary, limited international support |
From research question to validated insight
Define Your Research Question
Describe what you need to learn — user motivations, design feedback, concept validation. Our AI builds the discussion guide and recruits from a 4M+ panel matched to your user profile.
AI Conducts Depth Interviews
Each participant completes a 10-20 minute AI-moderated voice interview. The AI probes into motivations, expectations, and friction — not just whether they completed the task, but why they hesitated.
Synthesized Insights Delivered
Receive structured findings with themes, user segments, verbatim quotes, and clear design implications. Every insight links back to the actual conversation so your team can verify the evidence.
Research Repository Grows
Every study feeds a searchable research repository. PMs and designers query past research directly — 'what do we know about onboarding friction?' — so insights compound across the organization.
"User Intuition gave us the depth we needed at the speed we required. We stopped guessing about user motivations and started shipping with evidence from hundreds of conversations, not assumptions from a handful of tests."
Eric O., COO, RudderStack
When AI Helps and When a Human Should Lead UX Research
AI-moderated interviews accelerate qualitative research — but some UX scenarios benefit from human facilitation.
AI-Moderated Interviews Excel At
- Concept and prototype validation at scale
- Understanding user motivations behind behavior patterns
- Rapid discovery research within sprint cycles
- Cross-segment comparison with consistent methodology
- Continuous user feedback programs
- International UX research across 50+ languages
Consider Human Moderation For
- Live prototype walkthroughs requiring screen-sharing
- Accessibility research with assistive technology users
- Complex service design mapping sessions
- Participatory design and co-creation workshops
- Contextual inquiry in physical environments
- Sensitive topics requiring high emotional attunement
Methodology refined through Fortune 500 consulting engagements.
UX research that fits
inside your sprint cycle
In 48-72 hours, understand why users behave the way they do. Validate designs with hundreds of depth interviews before engineering invests.
See how UX teams embed continuous research into sprint cycles. We'll show you the full workflow from question to validated insight.
Launch a UX study in 10 minutes. Results in 48-72 hours. No recruiting, no scheduling, no contract.
No contract · No retainers · Results in 48-72 hours
Common questions
Go deeper on UX Researchers
Pillar Guides
Deep-dive guides covering this topic from strategy to execution.
Tools & Tactics
Practical frameworks and platform-specific guides for teams ready to act.
Reference Guides
Reference deep-dives on methodology, best practices, and applied research.
Alternatives & Comparisons
Side-by-side comparisons with competing platforms and approaches.
Industries
See how teams in specific verticals apply this research.
Platform Capabilities
The platform features that power this type of research.