Market Researchers

Run deeper studies, faster — without sacrificing rigor

You shouldn't have to choose between depth and speed — or between qual richness and quant scale. User Intuition runs 200+ AI-moderated interviews in 48-72 hours with 5-7 levels of probing depth per conversation, so you get the methodological rigor you demand at a pace your stakeholders need.

$20 per interview
48-72 hour turnaround
4M+ global panel
Intelligence Report Live
0% Data Quality
Depth
91%
Scale
84%
Speed
76%
AI Insight

Cross-segment analysis reveals price sensitivity varies 3x between cohorts...

User Intuition
Benchmark
88%
Live

Trusted by teams at

Capital One
RudderStack
Nivella Health
Turning Point Brands
BuildHer
Abacus Wealth
TL;DR

Market researchers are drowning in manual work — coding transcripts, managing recruit pipelines, stitching together tools — while stakeholders demand faster answers. Qual studies take weeks and cost tens of thousands. Survey data is shallow. You can't do both at once. And when you finally deliver, the insights sit in a deck that nobody references six months later. User Intuition eliminates the depth-vs.-scale tradeoff. Run 200+ AI-moderated interviews in 48-72 hours at $20/interview, with 5-7 levels of laddering depth per conversation. Every study compounds into a searchable intelligence hub — so your research builds on itself instead of starting from scratch every time.

The Problem

The tools changed. The tradeoffs
stayed the same.

Market research still forces you to choose: depth or scale, speed or rigor, qual or quant. It shouldn't.

01

Manual Coding Kills Speed

Your team spends days coding transcripts and building thematic frameworks. By the time analysis is done, the business has already made the decision without you.

02

Sample Quality Is a Constant Concern

Professional respondents, bot-generated answers, and panel fatigue plague every project. You spend more time cleaning data than analyzing it.

03

Qual Doesn't Scale

You can run 20 in-depth interviews or 2,000 surveys. You can't run 200 in-depth interviews. The depth-vs.-scale tradeoff is baked into every methodology.

04

Quant Lacks Depth

Surveys tell you 68% prefer Option A. They don't tell you why. You run a follow-up qual study to explain the numbers — doubling cost and timeline.

05

Tool Fragmentation Wastes Time

Screener in one tool. Moderation in another. Analysis in a third. Reporting in PowerPoint. Your tech stack creates busywork, not insight.

06

Stakeholders Are Skeptical of AI

Your leadership wants to see AI in the research process but doesn't trust it to maintain methodological standards. You need to prove rigor, not just speed.

Use Cases

How Market Researchers use
User Intuition

Consumer Insights

Map purchase motivations, brand perception, and unmet needs with 200+ in-depth interviews per study. Qual depth, quant confidence.

Growth opportunities from real evidence

Concept Testing

Test product concepts, packaging, and messaging with real consumers. Multi-concept A/B/C studies with consistent methodology.

20-40% better campaign ROI

Brand Health Tracking

Monitor brand perception, awareness, and consideration continuously — not just in quarterly waves. Detect shifts as they happen.

1-5% market share gains

Market Intelligence

Continuous competitive intelligence across markets. Understand how consumers perceive your brand vs. competitors in real time.

Continuous competitive intelligence

Competitive Intelligence

Run head-to-head perception studies. Understand switching triggers, competitive positioning gaps, and share-of-mind dynamics.

Evidence-backed competitive strategy

Shopper Insights

Map shopper missions, purchase triggers, and brand switching behavior at the shelf. Go beyond transaction data to understand intent.

First-mover advantage from early signals
Compare

User Intuition vs.
traditional Market Researchers tools

Dimension User Intuition Traditional Market Research Methods
Depth + Scale 200+ interviews at 30+ min depth each 20 IDIs or 2,000 shallow surveys — pick one
Turnaround 48-72 hours 4-12 weeks for qual, 2-4 weeks for quant
Cost per Interview $20/interview $500-$1,500 (qual) or $2-$5 (shallow survey)
Coding & Analysis Automated — structured themes in seconds Days of manual transcript coding
Sample Quality Multi-layer fraud prevention, 98% satisfaction Panel fatigue, professional respondents, bots
Languages 50+ languages, same methodology Local partners needed per market
Knowledge Retention Searchable Intelligence Hub Decks in shared drives, forgotten in 90 days
Methodological Consistency Identical probing across every interview Varies by moderator, day, and energy level
How It Works

From research question to evidence-backed findings

1
5 min

Design the Study

Define your research question, target audience, and any stimulus materials. Our AI builds the discussion guide with 5-7 level laddering structure — designed to surface the depth you need with the consistency traditional moderation can't match.

2
48-72 hrs

AI Conducts the Interviews

Each participant completes a 10-20 minute AI-moderated voice interview. The AI adapts dynamically to each respondent while maintaining methodological consistency across every conversation — no moderator drift, no leading questions.

3
Seconds

Analyze Evidence-Backed Findings

Receive structured thematic analysis with segment breakdowns, consumer verbatims, and evidence-traced findings. Every insight links back to the exact respondent quotes — so your stakeholders can verify the evidence themselves.

4
Ongoing

Build Compounding Research Knowledge

Every study feeds a searchable intelligence hub. Cross-study patterns emerge across projects. Your team builds on prior research instead of repeating it. New researchers onboard by querying institutional knowledge.

"We tested three packaging concepts in 72 hours and discovered one design was perceived as cheaper than competitors — despite premium positioning. User Intuition saved us from a costly repositioning disaster before we went to production."

Eric O., COO, RudderStack

Methodology & Trust

When AI Interviews Enhance Market Research and When a Human Should Lead

AI-moderated interviews deliver consistent, scalable qual — but some research designs still benefit from human moderation.

AI-Moderated Interviews Excel At

  • Large-scale qualitative studies (50-300+ interviews)
  • Multi-market research in 50+ languages with identical methodology
  • Concept, messaging, and packaging evaluation
  • Continuous tracking and longitudinal studies
  • Studies where moderator consistency is critical
  • Rapid-turnaround research for time-sensitive decisions

Consider Human Moderation For

  • Exploratory research with no defined hypothesis
  • Ethnographic and in-context observation research
  • Sensitive health, financial, or trauma-related topics
  • Co-creation and generative design sessions
  • Senior executive or C-suite respondents (B2B)
  • Research requiring physical product interaction

Methodology refined through Fortune 500 consulting engagements.

Get Started

Research that compounds
with every study you run

In 48-72 hours, get the depth of qual at the scale of quant. Every study builds a searchable knowledge base your team reuses forever.

Enterprise / Research Teams

See AI-moderated interviews in action. We'll walk through methodology, sample quality controls, and how the Intelligence Hub works.

Free Trial

Launch a study in 10 minutes. Results in 48-72 hours. Judge the methodology yourself.

No contract · No retainers · Results in 48-72 hours

FAQ

Common questions

The AI uses a 5-7 level laddering technique refined through Fortune 500 consulting engagements. It adapts dynamically to each respondent — probing deeper on interesting threads while maintaining non-leading language calibrated against research standards.
Yes — and in some dimensions, better. AI moderation eliminates moderator drift, leading questions, and fatigue bias. Every interview follows the same probing structure. 98% of participants rate the experience positively, and completion rates run 30-45% (3-5x higher than surveys).
Multi-layer fraud prevention including bot detection, duplicate suppression, and professional respondent filtering. Our 4M+ panel is vetted for quality. You can also blend panel respondents with your own first-party customer lists.
Yes. Export full transcripts, structured theme codes, segment data, and verbatims. The platform handles automated analysis, but you always have access to the raw data for your own methodological approach.
Every finding is evidence-traced to specific respondent quotes. Stakeholders can verify any insight by reading the exact words participants used. The methodology is transparent, auditable, and consistent — which is more than most human-moderated research can claim.
That's exactly what User Intuition enables. Each interview delivers qual depth (30+ minutes, open-ended probing) at quant scale (200+ respondents). You get thematic richness and statistical confidence in the same study.
50+ languages with the same laddering methodology. No need to hire local moderators or translate discussion guides manually. The AI conducts native-language interviews with culturally appropriate probing.
Each interview costs $20 on Professional plans. Studies start at $200. A 200-interview study costs a fraction of a traditional 20-person IDI project ($15K-$27K) — and delivers 10x the sample with equivalent depth.
A searchable, permanent knowledge base where every study compounds. Cross-study pattern recognition surfaces themes across projects, segments, and time periods. Your research builds on itself instead of each study sitting in isolation.
Yes. Set up continuous research programs that interview the same or similar audiences over time. Track how perceptions shift, measure the impact of interventions, and build trend data — all at $20/interview.
Explore More

Go deeper on Market Researchers

Alternatives & Comparisons

Side-by-side comparisons with competing platforms and approaches.

Industries

See how teams in specific verticals apply this research.

Platform Capabilities

The platform features that power this type of research.