Concept intelligence that compounds with every test
Every consumer conversation becomes searchable institutional knowledge. Test concepts in 72 hours. Reuse insights forever. Stop starting from scratch with every new idea.
Concept A outperforms B on appeal and purchase intent across all segments...
Concept intelligence that compounds means treating each consumer conversation as a building block of organizational learning. Instead of one-off studies filed away, every test contributes to a searchable knowledge base that informs future decisions, accelerates iteration, and compounds in value as your organization learns what resonates across concepts, segments, and market conditions.
Your concepts aren't getting smarter
— your organization is just getting older
Every concept test is treated as a standalone project. You learn something, file the deck, and when the next concept comes along, nobody remembers what worked last time.
Insights Don't Compound
Each study lives in a shared drive. A designer testing a new concept can't access what you learned about color perception 6 months ago.
Teams Re-Learn the Same Lessons
Your organization tests packaging designs and learns that certain palettes drive premium perception. Next product line launches — the new team doesn't know this.
Speed Prevents Iteration
Traditional agencies: 6–12 weeks, $25K–$75K per concept. You test once and hope. Cost and timeline make iteration impossible.
Shallow Feedback Hides the Real Story
"68% like it." Now what? A score tells you nothing about why consumers respond. You miss the real drivers.
Knowledge Walks Out the Door
A director who spent two years building concept understanding gets hired elsewhere. New director starts from zero institutional knowledge.
No Cross-Concept Pattern Recognition
Without searchable, organized concept intelligence, teams repeat research. They consume budget without building compounding organizational knowledge.
Real-world applications
for concept testing
Product Concept Testing
Test new product ideas, improvements, or feature combinations before committing to development and launch.
Packaging Design Testing
Test packaging designs, label refreshes, sustainability claims, and material changes before production.
Messaging & Positioning
Test different positioning angles, benefit statements, and campaign messages before rolling out.
Ad Concept & Creative Testing
Test video ads, print concepts, social media creatives, and tagline alternatives before spending on production.
Brand & Product Naming
Test whether product names are memorable, communicate the right message, and avoid negative associations.
Pricing & Value Perception
Test pricing strategies, bundle options, subscription vs. purchase models, and perceived value.
User Intuition vs.
traditional concept testing
| Dimension | User Intuition | Surveys / Focus Groups / Agencies |
|---|---|---|
| Interview Depth | 30+ min · 5–7 laddering levels | 2–10 min, surface reactions |
| Turnaround | 72 hours | 1–12 weeks depending on method |
| Study Cost | From $200 | $1K–$75K+ depending on method |
| Sample Size | 50–300 1-on-1 interviews | 8–12 (focus groups) or 500+ shallow surveys |
| Iteration Speed | Test, refine, re-test in 1 week | Single test, wait weeks to iterate |
| Groupthink Risk | None · every interview is 1-on-1 | High in focus groups, moderate in surveys |
| Panelist Pool | 4M+ screened consumers | Local recruits or panel fatigue |
| Key Output | WHY consumers react; motivation drivers | THAT they reacted; top-2-box scores |
From question to brand intelligence
Brief
Define your concept, audience, and research questions
Set Sample
Choose 50–300 consumers from 4M+ panel
Launch
AI conducts 30+ min interviews 24/7
Analyze
Themed findings, consumer quotes, segments
Iterate
Refine concept and re-test if needed
Compound
Every test builds searchable institutional knowledge
"We tested three packaging concepts in 72 hours and discovered one design was perceived as cheaper than competitors — despite premium positioning. User Intuition saved us from a costly repositioning disaster before we went to production."
Director of Innovation — CPG Company
When AI Helps and When a Human Should Lead Concept Testing
AI-moderated interviews deliver fast, consistent concept evaluation — but some testing scenarios benefit from human moderation.
AI-Moderated Interviews Excel At
- Structured concept evaluation at scale
- Multi-concept A/B/C testing with consistent methodology
- Packaging and messaging resonance testing
- Iterative test-learn-refine cycles in 72 hours
- Cross-market concept validation across languages
- Removing moderator bias from concept feedback
Consider Human Moderation For
- Early-stage ideation and co-creation sessions
- Physical product prototypes requiring hands-on interaction
- Highly abstract or visionary concepts needing explanation
- Sensitive category concepts (healthcare, finance)
- Executive stakeholder alignment workshops
- Ethnographic concept-in-context research
Methodology refined through Fortune 500 consulting engagements.
Concept intelligence that
compounds with every test
In 72 hours, understand why consumers respond to your concept. Every test builds a searchable knowledge base your team reuses forever.
See concept testing in action. We'll help you design a continuous testing program that builds institutional knowledge.
Launch a concept test in 10 minutes. Results in 72 hours. No contract required.
No contract · No retainers · Results in 72 hours