Brand Health Tracking

Brand intelligence that compounds over time

Run identical brand conversations today and again in six months. See how perception shifts. Build knowledge that compounds instead of reports that expire.

72-hour turnaround
Studies from $200
4M+ panelists
Intelligence Report Live
0% Perception
Trust
84%
Quality
76%
Value
52%
AI Insight

Brand trust increased 12 points quarter-over-quarter following transparency initiatives...

User Intuition
Benchmark
68%
Live
98% customer satisfactionSub-72-hour turnaround guaranteed4M+ global consumer panelISO 27001 / GDPR / HIPAA compliantFortune 500 methodology at startup cost
TL;DR

Brand intelligence that compounds means measuring your brand perception today, then measuring again with identical methodology in three months. You spot perception trends. You see when messaging starts working or stops resonating. You detect brand erosion before it hits sales. Your brand knowledge improves with each measurement cycle.

The Problem

Brand health studies are
snapshots, not systems

Brand perception erodes quietly. Traditional trackers capture a single moment, freeze it, and move on.

01

Can't Track What You Can't Repeat

Awareness at 68% this year, 71% next year. Different people, different methods. Real growth or noise?

02

Knowledge Doesn't Accumulate

Each study starts from zero. You can't answer: "Has preference improved since Q1?"

03

Snapshots Miss Gradual Erosion

A 2-point drop looks like noise once. That same drop across 4 quarters is a declining trend.

04

No Campaign Baseline

You spend $2M on rebranding. Awareness is up 4%. Without identical pre-measurement, you can't isolate what shifted.

05

Competitive Perception Stays Surface

"Innovation" means "premium" to your customers and "cutting-edge" to theirs. Your tracker can't see the difference.

06

Expensive, Inflexible Retainers

$25K–$75K/year for 4–6 waves. Faster turnaround or customization? That costs extra.

Use Cases

Real-world applications
for brand health tracking

Replace Annual Brand Tracker

Quarterly studies at $1K–$2.5K per wave instead of $50K annual programs. Results in 72 hours, not 6 weeks.

Better intel at 1/5 the cost

Pre & Post Campaign

Test perception, show new positioning, measure the shift. Validate your $5M rebrand in 2 weeks.

Avoid spend that won't land

Competitive Threat Response

Understand what a new competitor owns in consumers' minds and whether they're taking share from you.

Respond strategically

Brand Repositioning

Moving upmarket? Test whether consumers will accept the shift and what needs to change.

Eliminate strategy guesswork

Seasonal Validation

Test whether your campaign signals "value" or "desperation" before committing $3M.

Optimize before launch

Shelf Diagnostics

Volume flat? Surface whether the barrier is shelf position, packaging, price, or perception.

Fix the real problem
Compare

User Intuition vs.
traditional brand health tracking

Dimension User Intuition Qualtrics / YouGov / Traditional
Interview Depth 30+ min · 5–7 laddering levels 10 min, surface associations
Turnaround 72 hours 2–4 weeks (1–2 rush, premium price)
Study Cost From $200 $15K–$100K+ retainers
Quarterly Tracking $4K–$10K / yr $25K–$75K / yr with fixed retainers
Longitudinal Tracking Save methodology, one-click re-launch New RFP and custom setup each wave
Annual Commitment None · pay per study $25K–$75K retainers or longer contracts
Panelist Pool 4M+ screened consumers National panels (quota-based, turnover)
Key Output WHY perception shifted; equity drivers THAT it shifted; awareness scores
How It Works

From question to brand intelligence

1
5 min

Define Question

Write your brand research question

2
10 min

Set Sample

Choose 10–500+ consumers

3
Real time

Launch

Watch interviews stream in

4
72 hrs

Analyze

Full transcripts + auto themes

5
Quarterly

Track

Re-run identical methodology

6
1 week

Act

Share insights, adjust strategy

"User Intuition helped us understand that our campaign moved awareness but didn't shift brand perception. We adjusted messaging mid-campaign and saw a 23% improvement in intent. This would've been invisible in traditional trackers."

Director of Brand — CPG Company

Methodology & Trust

When AI Helps and When a Human Should Lead Brand Research

AI-moderated interviews excel at structured brand tracking — but some brand questions still need a human touch.

AI-Moderated Interviews Excel At

  • Quarterly brand perception tracking at scale
  • Consistent methodology across hundreds of respondents
  • Competitive positioning and switching trigger analysis
  • Messaging resonance testing across segments
  • Multilingual brand research across markets
  • Eliminating interviewer bias in brand perception studies

Consider Human Moderation For

  • Exploratory brand strategy workshops
  • Sensitive brand crisis perception research
  • C-suite stakeholder interviews on brand vision
  • Ethnographic brand immersion studies
  • Co-creation sessions for brand repositioning
  • Deep cultural context requiring local expertise

Methodology refined through Fortune 500 consulting engagements.

Get Started

Brand intelligence that
compounds quarterly

In 72 hours, understand your brand perception. Six months from now, spot trends competitors take years to notice.

Enterprise / Strategic

See quarterly brand tracking in action. We'll help you design a continuous monitoring program.

Quick Start

Launch a brand health study in 5 minutes. Results in 72 hours. No contract required.

No contract · No retainers · Results in 72 hours

FAQ

Common questions

Brand health tracking is the systematic measurement of how consumers perceive your brand over time. User Intuition reveals why perception shifts, not just that it shifted.
Studies start at $200. Quarterly tracking runs $4K–$10K/year — compared to $25K–$75K for traditional trackers. No retainers.
Quarterly is recommended. Enough time to detect meaningful shifts while catching erosion early.
Yes — this is the core difference. Traditional trackers report that awareness went from 68% to 71%. User Intuition reveals what consumers associate with your brand and what drives preference.
No. Anyone on your team — VP of Marketing, brand manager, or product lead — can launch a study. No vendor management, no RFPs.
AI moderators conduct 30+ minute conversations with real consumers using laddering methodology — 5–7 rounds that move from surface perceptions to the psychological drivers behind brand preference. You save your methodology and re-run it quarterly to track shifts.
Brand perception, equity drivers, competitive positioning, messaging resonance, purchase intent drivers, association strength, and segment-level trends. Critically, we surface why these metrics move — not just that they did.
Traditional trackers tell you that awareness went from 68% to 71%. User Intuition tells you why — which messages resonate, what drives preference, and where perception is vulnerable. 72 hours vs. 2–4 weeks. A fraction of the cost. No retainers.
CPG teams use User Intuition to replace annual trackers with quarterly studies, validate campaign messaging before and after launch, diagnose shelf performance issues, respond to competitive threats, and detect brand erosion across demographic segments early.
The Intelligence Hub is your longitudinal brand dashboard — it stores every study you've run, lets you compare results across quarters, and surfaces trend data automatically. It's where brand knowledge compounds instead of living in disconnected slide decks.