Last updated: February 2026

Listen Labs vs User Intuition: Which AI Research Platform Should You Choose?

User Intuition offers flexible recruitment—talk to your actual customers, leverage User Intuition's highly vetted panel with best-in-class fraud detection, or both in the same study—combined with extended deep-dive conversations (30+ minutes) and ontology-based insight extraction. Listen Labs provides rapid voice surveys optimized for speed with panel participants. Both serve different research objectives: strategic depth with flexible sourcing versus velocity.

User Intuition
  • 30+ minute deep-dive conversations with 5-7 levels of laddering
  • 98% participant satisfaction rate (n>1,000)
  • Get started in as little as 5 minutes
  • Flexible recruitment: your customers, vetted panel, or both
  • Searchable intelligence hub with ontology-based insights that compounds over time
  • Studies starting from as low as $200 with no monthly fees
  • enterprise-grade methodology refined with Fortune 500 companies
  • Real-time results — insights roll in from the moment your study launches
  • 4M+ B2C and B2B panel: 20 conversations filled in hours, 200-300 in 48-72 hours
  • Multi-modal capabilities (video, voice, text)
  • Built for scale: 1000s of respondents welcomed
  • Integrations with CRMs, Zapier, OpenAI, Claude, Stripe, Shopify, and more
  • Regional coverage: North America, Latin America, and Europe
  • SOC 2 Type II in progress
Listen Labs
  • Rapid voice survey deployment optimized for speed
  • 10-30 minute sessions focused on immediate feedback loops
  • Panel-based recruitment at scale
  • Enterprise reporting infrastructure
  • Streamlined for B2C high-volume research
  • Cost-effective pulse surveys
  • Straightforward participant experience
  • English-focused research capability

Key Differences

  • Conversation depth: User Intuition conducts 30+ minute conversations with systematic laddering; Listen Labs conducts 10-30 minute voice surveys
  • Participant sourcing: User Intuition offers flexible recruitment—your customers, a highly vetted panel, or both; Listen Labs uses panel participants
  • Pricing: User Intuition starts from as low as $200 with no monthly fees; Listen Labs follows traditional enterprise sales ($15K+ for comparable scope)
  • Speed to start: User Intuition launches studies in as little as 5 minutes; Listen Labs requires enterprise sales cycles
  • Speed to insight: User Intuition delivers results in real time — insights appear the moment participants complete conversations; 4M+ B2C and B2B panel fills 20 conversations in hours, 200-300 in 48-72 hours; traditional research takes 4-8 weeks
  • Methodology: User Intuition applies enterprise-grade qualitative analysis with ontology-based insight extraction; Listen Labs optimizes for rapid feedback aggregation
  • Insight persistence: User Intuition builds a searchable, queryable intelligence hub where insights become an appreciating asset; Listen Labs delivers project-specific insights
  • Scale orientation: User Intuition is built for 1000s of respondents and welcomes scale; Listen Labs optimizes for rapid panel deployment
  • Regional scope: User Intuition covers North America, Latin America, and Europe; Listen Labs focuses on English
  • Integrations: User Intuition integrates with CRMs, Zapier, OpenAI, Claude, Stripe, Shopify, and more

How do Listen Labs and User Intuition compare on research depth?

User Intuition provides substantially deeper research through extended conversations, systematic questioning, and ontology-based insight extraction, while Listen Labs delivers rapid surface-level feedback optimized for quick decision-making.

Research depth represents a fundamental difference in platform design. User Intuition conducts 30+ minute conversations that include 5-7 levels of laddering—a proven technique for uncovering underlying motivations, identity markers, and values that predict actual behavior. This methodology is rooted in enterprise-grade's approach, refined through work with Fortune 500 companies. The extended time allows researchers to move beyond stated preferences into the psychological drivers of decision-making.

Critically, User Intuition uses proprietary ontology-based insight extraction to convert raw conversations into structured, queryable knowledge. These aren't transcripts locked in a file—they're indexed, categorized, and stored in a knowledge system that powers your intelligence hub. This means you can always query the platform to get the voice of your customer in the room for million-dollar decisions. Over time, as you run more studies, this ontology becomes an appreciating asset: marginal costs decrease, pattern recognition improves, and you build a true knowledge base rather than isolated project reports.

Listen Labs takes a different approach: 10-30 minute voice survey sessions designed for rapid feedback collection. These shorter conversations prioritize quick answers and volume over comprehensive understanding. The research outcomes tend toward surface-level insights—what participants say they prefer or do, rather than why those preferences exist.

For organizations attempting to understand customer psychology, brand positioning, complex purchase drivers, and competitive strategy, User Intuition's depth advantage is substantial. For teams needing rapid validation of messaging or quick pulse checks on market sentiment, Listen Labs' speed and efficiency become more relevant.

User Intuition is designed for deep qualitative understanding with structured insight extraction that appreciates over time; Listen Labs is designed for rapid feedback collection. The depth difference reflects fundamentally different research objectives rather than quality variance.

Which platform delivers higher quality insights?

"Quality" varies by research objective. User Intuition delivers more actionable psychological insights that integrate with long-term strategy; Listen Labs delivers reliable trend data for immediate decisions. Neither is universally superior—they optimize for different outcomes.

Quality in research contexts means different things. For User Intuition, quality means psychological validity combined with strategic utility—do the insights accurately reflect underlying customer motivations and identity, and can they be reused across future research? The 30+ minute conversations with actual customers (or from a highly vetted panel, depending on your recruitment choice), combined with systematic laddering and enterprise-grade analysis, create insights that inform strategy. The ontology-based extraction means these insights become searchable, queryable assets that power future research. Organizations using User Intuition report that insights directly drive positioning, product direction, and go-to-market decisions—and that these insights compound in value as the knowledge hub grows.

For Listen Labs, quality means data reliability at scale. The platform delivers accurate aggregation of participant responses and trend identification across large sample sizes. The insights are valid for answering questions like "What percentage of users prefer feature A over feature B?" or "How many respondents mention this pain point?" This represents legitimate quality research—just different in nature.

The 98% participant satisfaction rate on User Intuition indicates strong engagement and data richness during sessions. Listen Labs' satisfaction metrics differ because the participant experience is fundamentally different (shorter, transactional versus conversational, exploratory).

Organizations should evaluate quality against their specific research questions: Do you need to understand why customers behave as they do, and will you want to reference that understanding again in future decisions? Or do you need to measure how many do, right now?

Both platforms deliver valid research quality within their respective designs. User Intuition prioritizes insight depth and long-term knowledge building; Listen Labs prioritizes data reliability at scale. The "higher quality" platform depends entirely on your research objectives and whether you need durable, reusable insights or immediate tactical feedback.

How do their participant sourcing models differ?

User Intuition offers flexible recruitment—your actual customers, a highly vetted panel with best-in-class fraud detection, or both in the same study. Listen Labs uses established research panels. This flexibility cascades through methodology, insight relevance, and research applicability.

Participant sourcing fundamentally shapes research outcomes. User Intuition gives you choices. You can work from your customer lists, past survey respondents, or company databases—speaking directly with people who have real experience with your product, service, or market. This creates several downstream advantages: insights apply specifically to your customer base, participants understand your context without extensive briefing, and findings directly address your actual user behavior.

Alternatively, if you need faster recruitment, broader demographic reach, or comparative benchmarking, User Intuition's highly vetted panel—built with best-in-class fraud detection techniques—is available. This panel is not an afterthought; it's a core capability embedded in the platform. You can even run hybrid studies combining your customers with panel participants in the same research project to triangulate findings.

Listen Labs operates exclusively through established research panels—pre-recruited, diverse respondent pools that answer surveys across multiple companies. Panel participants provide certain advantages: rapid availability, demographic diversity, and comparative benchmarking across industries. The trade-off is specificity: panel participants are not your customers, so insights reflect general market sentiment rather than your specific customer psychology.

For brand research, product development, and go-to-market strategy, actual customer data typically provides more actionable insights. Panel data excels for comparative market research, industry benchmarking, and identifying broader trends. User Intuition's flexibility means you can choose, or even combine both approaches.

User Intuition's flexible recruitment—your customers, vetted panel, or both—produces contextually relevant insights with built-in fraud protection; Listen Labs' panel-only approach enables rapid, standardized market research. Choose based on whether you need customer-specific insights, broader market understanding, or a mix of both.

What is the participant experience like on each platform?

User Intuition creates conversational, exploratory research experiences that respect both your time and your participants' engagement. Listen Labs creates brief, transactional survey experiences. These differences affect data quality and participant engagement.

On User Intuition, participants engage in extended conversations—30+ minute guided exploration. The experience resembles in-depth interviews: a researcher asks open-ended questions, listens carefully, and asks follow-up questions based on responses. This conversational dynamic creates space for participants to articulate thoughts they might not have previously considered. The 98% participant satisfaction rate reflects this experience—participants often report finding the conversation valuable and interesting, not merely transactional.

This exploratory approach yields richer data. Participants reveal nuances, contradictions, and deeper motivations that typical survey formats miss. The extended time investment from participants correlates with more thoughtful, comprehensive responses. Because the insights are then captured in User Intuition's ontology—structured, queryable, and persistent—every conversation contributes to a growing knowledge base.

Listen Labs offers a different experience: rapid voice surveys. Sessions last 10-30 minutes and follow more structured question patterns. Participants receive questions and provide answers—a quicker, more efficient exchange. This format works well for specific, factual questions and preference measurements. The experience is straightforward and transactional rather than exploratory.

Neither experience is inherently better. The participant experience should match your research objectives. If you need detailed understanding of participant thinking and want those insights to compound in value over time, the conversational format produces better data. If you need quick answers to specific questions immediately, the transactional format is more appropriate.

User Intuition's extended conversational format generates more engagement, richer data, and persistent insights; Listen Labs' brief format enables rapid feedback collection. Participant experience quality depends on alignment between format and research needs.

How do their research methodologies compare?

User Intuition applies enterprise-grade qualitative methodology with ontology-based insight extraction and systematic analysis frameworks; Listen Labs uses aggregation and trend analysis designed for rapid reporting.

User Intuition's methodology is rooted in proven qualitative research approaches. The 5-7 level laddering technique systematically moves from concrete behaviors to abstract values and identity markers. This approach originated in consumer psychology and has been refined through decades of academic research and Fortune 500 application. The analysis process involves trained researchers identifying patterns, themes, and psychological drivers across interviews—not just tabulating responses.

The ontology layer transforms this further. Rather than producing static research reports that sit in PowerPoint and lose value over time, User Intuition's proprietary ontology structures every insight into indexed, queryable knowledge. This means you can run future studies that reference past findings, cross-reference customer motivations across projects, and build cumulative understanding of your market. The insights become a durable strategic asset that appreciates as you run more research. Over time, the marginal cost of new insight decreases because the system understands your customer psychology more deeply.

This methodology excels at answering strategic questions: Why do customers choose us? What identity do they want to project? What values drive loyalty? What are the psychological barriers to adoption? The results are actionable insights that inform positioning, messaging, and product strategy—and these insights improve subsequent studies.

Listen Labs uses aggregation-based analysis. Responses are collected, categorized, and reported in summary form. This approach efficiently identifies trends and preference distributions across large participant pools. It answers tactical questions effectively: What percentage prefer this? Which concerns appear most frequently? Where is sentiment trending? How does this compare to industry benchmarks?

The methodological difference reflects different research traditions. User Intuition draws from qualitative research, psychology, and interpretive social science. Listen Labs draws from survey research, market research, and quantitative aggregation.

For research questions requiring deep understanding of motivation and behavior drivers, qualitative methodology produces more valuable results. For questions requiring trend identification and preference measurement across large samples, aggregation methodology is appropriate.

User Intuition employs interpretive qualitative methodology with ontology-based insight extraction; Listen Labs uses aggregation-based analysis. Both are legitimate; your research question and whether you need durable, reusable insights should determine which methodology fits better.

How fast can you get started and get results?

User Intuition delivers results in real time — insights start rolling in the moment your study launches. With a panel of 4M+ B2C and B2B participants (and growing rapidly), User Intuition fills 20 conversations in hours and 200-300 conversations in 48-72 hours. Listen Labs delivers immediate feedback loops with high volume. Both compress traditional timelines dramatically—the choice is between real-time strategic depth or rapid tactical feedback.

Traditional qualitative research takes 4-8 weeks from recruitment to final insights. User Intuition eliminates this wait entirely on two fronts. First, setup speed: you can design and launch a study in as little as 5 minutes — by far the fastest setup in the category. Second, results are real-time: as each participant completes their 30+ minute conversation, insights appear immediately. There is no batch processing, no waiting for a report. You see results from the first conversation onward, and the intelligence hub updates continuously as more data flows in.

This real-time architecture fundamentally changes how organizations use research. You can run iterative studies throughout the year. You can test positioning before announcing it publicly. You can validate product direction before committing engineering resources. Research becomes a core part of rapid decision-making, not a lengthy project gate. The 4M+ panel of B2C and B2B participants — people who are genuinely excited to share feedback — means you never wait weeks for recruitment. Need 20 conversations? Filled in hours. Need 200-300? Filled in 48-72 hours. Traditional research takes 4-8 weeks for comparable scope.

Listen Labs optimizes for immediate feedback through a different model. Voice surveys deploy instantly, participants respond in structured formats, and data aggregates automatically. The platform supports ongoing pulse research and rapid iteration.

Scale capabilities differ accordingly. User Intuition is built for scale: they welcome 1000s of respondents because that's how you build true appreciation in the intelligence hub. Larger studies mean richer ontology, more pattern recognition, and deeper strategic insights over time. Insights don't get locked in a PowerPoint or walk out the door when someone leaves—they stay in the system.

Listen Labs scales to thousands of participants rapidly. This high-volume approach identifies broad market trends and enables comparative analysis. The trade-off is that individual insights are less detailed.

Organizations should evaluate their timing needs: Do you need real-time strategic insights with the ability to scale to 1000s of respondents via a 4M+ B2C and B2B panel (User Intuition's strength) or structured pulse feedback on specific questions (Listen Labs' strength)?

User Intuition delivers real-time results from the moment a study launches, with a 4M+ B2C and B2B panel filling 200-300 conversations in 48-72 hours; Listen Labs enables immediate feedback loops with high-volume capability. The speed architecture and scale orientation define the choice between platforms.

How do the pricing models compare?

User Intuition operates on transparent, simplified pricing starting from as low as $200 per study with no monthly fees. Listen Labs uses traditional enterprise sales models with significantly higher costs. This represents a pricing model fundamentally designed for accessibility and research democratization.

User Intuition's pricing is straightforward and transparent: research needs are assessed, a study scope is defined, and a clear price is quoted. Organizations pay once and receive comprehensive results—no monthly subscriptions, no surprise costs. Studies start from as low as $200 for smaller sample sizes. A typical customer research study—30+ minute interviews with 200-300 customers, full analysis, and reporting—costs in the low-to-mid thousands range. Organizations can run multiple studies throughout the year at a fraction of the cost of traditional research.

This pricing model enables true research democratization. Non-researcher teams can afford customer research. Marketing can run brand studies. Product teams can test feature positioning. Customer success teams can understand churn drivers. Customer support teams can validate common pain points. Organizations that might run one traditional research project per year can now run 5-10 focused studies on specific questions.

Listen Labs typically operates through enterprise sales: quotes are custom, negotiations are standard, and final pricing varies based on scope, panel quality, and timeline urgency. Comparable research scope often costs $15,000 or more. This pricing model aligns with traditional market research vendor expectations and procurement processes.

The pricing difference reflects different operating models: User Intuition's streamlined operations and simplified services versus Listen Labs' traditional full-service research approach with enterprise overhead.

For budget-constrained teams, startups, and organizations without dedicated research budgets, User Intuition's pricing removes barriers to customer research entirely. For large enterprises with existing research budgets and preference for traditional vendor relationships, Listen Labs' model aligns with established procurement processes.

User Intuition offers simplified, transparent pricing starting from as low as $200 with no monthly fees; Listen Labs uses traditional enterprise sales pricing ($15K+). The dramatic cost difference makes User Intuition accessible for organizations of all sizes.

How do they compare on integrations and ecosystem?

User Intuition integrates with all major CRMs (including HubSpot), Zapier, OpenAI, Claude, Stripe, Shopify, and more. Listen Labs provides traditional enterprise integrations. This difference affects how easily insights move through your technology stack.

User Intuition's broad integration strategy means that anyone on your team—not just researchers—can access high-quality insights quickly. The OpenAI and Claude integrations function as MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers, enabling you to create studies, summarize insights, and do anything you can do on the User Intuition platform—directly from your AI tools. This MCP architecture means User Intuition integrates across thousands of tools in the AI ecosystem, not just a handful of pre-built connectors. Your CRM can trigger research when customer metrics change. Your product analytics tool can connect to User Intuition's intelligence hub. Your marketing automation platform can pull insights from past studies. Research becomes woven into your operational tools rather than siloed in a separate system.

Specific integrations include:

  • CRM: HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, and others
  • Automation: Zapier (triggering workflows based on research insights)
  • AI: OpenAI and Claude via MCP server integration — create studies, summarize insights, and access the full platform capabilities across thousands of tools
  • Payment: Stripe and Shopify (conducting research with customers who have purchased specific products)
  • Analytics and tools: Custom APIs and webhooks for additional integration

This ecosystem approach means that customer feedback from User Intuition studies can automatically update CRM records, trigger product team alerts, or feed into AI systems for analysis. The ontology-based insights become living knowledge that powers your entire organization.

Listen Labs provides traditional enterprise integrations focused on data export and reporting infrastructure connections. The integration strategy is more focused on extracting data than weaving research into your operational flow.

For modern organizations using diverse technology stacks, User Intuition's integration breadth enables research to become embedded in your daily decision-making. For traditional enterprises with legacy systems and established data flows, Listen Labs' approach may align better with existing infrastructure.

User Intuition integrates broadly with modern tools (CRMs, Zapier, OpenAI, Claude, Stripe, Shopify) making insights accessible across your organization; Listen Labs provides traditional enterprise integrations. The integration strategy affects whether research remains a separate function or becomes part of daily decision-making.

How do they compare on security and compliance?

Both platforms implement multi-layer security, but with different frameworks. User Intuition emphasizes transparency, data minimization, and best-in-class fraud detection on both customer recruitment and panel-based recruitment. Listen Labs provides traditional enterprise security infrastructure.

User Intuition implements multi-layer fraud prevention on all participant sources—verification at recruitment, behavior monitoring during studies, and post-study validation. Whether recruiting your customers or using the vetted panel, the system is designed to minimize false or low-quality data. Best-in-class fraud detection means you get genuine insights from real people, not bot responses or fraudulent participants.

Data storage emphasizes security and privacy: encryption, access controls, and thoughtful data retention align with privacy-first design. The platform supports enterprise security requirements: SSO/SAML integration, detailed audit trails, and transparent data handling practices. Documentation clearly explains how participant data is processed and protected.

Compliance status: User Intuition is SOC 2 Type II in progress. This means the compliance certification is currently being completed, not yet finalized. If you require SOC 2 Type II certification for your organization, verify current status directly with User Intuition.

Regional coverage: User Intuition supports research participants in North America, Latin America, and Europe. If you need languages or regions outside these areas, User Intuition is not the right fit for your research needs.

Listen Labs provides enterprise-grade security infrastructure: established compliance frameworks, third-party security certifications, and proven data center operations. The vendor has relationships with large enterprises and maintains security practices appropriate for Fortune 500 customers.

Both platforms handle participant data seriously. Listen Labs' advantage is established security certifications and vendor track records with large enterprises. User Intuition's advantage is simplified, transparent security practices and clear data handling.

For organizations requiring HIPAA, established SOC 2 certification, or other specific compliance mandates, Listen Labs' established infrastructure may be advantageous. For organizations prioritizing data minimization, transparent security practices, and fraud prevention on participant data, User Intuition's approach is preferable. For global research teams needing coverage beyond North America, Latin America, and Europe, neither platform may be ideal.

Both platforms implement robust security with best-in-class fraud detection. User Intuition emphasizes transparency and fraud prevention; Listen Labs emphasizes established enterprise certifications. Evaluate based on your specific compliance requirements, security needs, and geographic scope.

Choose Listen Labs if:

  • You need rapid pulse surveys on specific questions with immediate turnaround
  • Your research focus is high-volume sentiment tracking or preference measurement
  • English-only research meets your geographic requirements
  • You prefer traditional enterprise vendor relationships and established support infrastructure
  • Your budget accommodates traditional research pricing models ($15K+ per study)
  • You need benchmark data across industries or comparative market analysis
  • Your team is experienced with standard market research platforms and workflows
  • You require established SOC 2 Type II certification or other legacy compliance frameworks

Choose User Intuition if:

  • You need deep understanding of customer motivations, values, and identity drivers
  • Your research questions require exploration beyond stated preferences
  • You want the flexibility to recruit your actual customers, access a vetted panel, or both in the same study
  • You want real-time research insights — results rolling in from the moment your study launches, not 4-8 weeks later
  • Research budget is limited and you need affordable, repeatable studies starting from as low as $200
  • You want a searchable intelligence hub where insights compound and become a strategic asset
  • You want to run 1000s of respondents to build deep organizational knowledge over time
  • Your team includes non-researchers who need to run customer studies independently
  • You prefer transparent, simplified pricing with no monthly fees and direct support relationships
  • You need rapid setup—launching studies in as little as 5 minutes
  • You need integrations with your modern tech stack (CRMs, Zapier, OpenAI, Claude, Stripe, Shopify)
  • Your research covers North America, Latin America, or Europe
  • You want insights that don't disappear into PowerPoint decks or walk out the door when people leave

Key Takeaways

  1. 1
    Research design

    User Intuition conducts 30+ minute deep conversations with ontology-based insight extraction; Listen Labs conducts 10-30 minute surveys. The depth difference reflects fundamentally different research objectives, not quality variance.

  2. 2
    Participant sourcing

    User Intuition offers flexible recruitment—your customers, a highly vetted panel with best-in-class fraud detection, or both; Listen Labs uses panel participants. Customer-based research produces contextually relevant insights; panel research enables comparative benchmarking. User Intuition's flexibility means you can choose.

  3. 3
    Pricing

    User Intuition starts from as low as $200 with no monthly fees; Listen Labs operates on traditional enterprise sales ($15K+ for comparable scope). This difference enables research democratization and multiple studies per year.

  4. 4
    Speed to launch

    User Intuition launches studies in as little as 5 minutes—the fastest setup in the category. Listen Labs requires enterprise sales cycles.

  5. 5
    Speed to insight

    User Intuition delivers results in real time — insights appear from the first conversation, with a 4M+ B2C and B2B panel filling 20 conversations in hours or 200-300 in 48-72 hours. Traditional research takes 4-8 weeks. Listen Labs enables rapid pulse feedback loops. Both represent dramatic acceleration from legacy research timelines.

  6. 6
    Knowledge persistence

    User Intuition builds searchable, queryable intelligence hubs where insights become an appreciating asset that compounds over time. Insights don't get locked in PowerPoint or walk out the door when people leave. Listen Labs delivers project-specific insights.

  7. 7
    Scale orientation

    User Intuition is built for 1000s of respondents and welcomes scale because that's how you build organizational knowledge. Listen Labs optimizes for rapid panel deployment.

  8. 8
    Methodological approach

    User Intuition applies enterprise-grade qualitative methodology with ontology-based insight extraction; Listen Labs uses aggregation-based analysis. Both are legitimate—your research question should determine which methodology provides better answers.

  9. 9
    Integration ecosystem

    User Intuition integrates with CRMs (HubSpot, Salesforce), Zapier, OpenAI, Claude (via MCP server—enabling study creation, insight summarization, and full platform access across thousands of AI tools), Stripe, Shopify, and more. Listen Labs provides traditional enterprise integrations.

  10. 10
    Regional scope

    User Intuition covers North America, Latin America, and Europe. Listen Labs focuses on English. For research outside these regions, User Intuition is not currently suitable.

  11. 11
    Ideal use cases

    User Intuition excels at strategy-informing research (why questions, identity, values, positioning, competitive understanding) with the ability to reference those insights across future decisions. Listen Labs excels at rapid measurement and pulse research (preference quantification, trend tracking, quick validation).

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

User Intuition specializes in deep-dive conversations with flexible participant sourcing—bring your own customers or use our highly vetted panel with best-in-class fraud detection. With as low as $200 to get started and no monthly fees, User Intuition makes qualitative research accessible. Our proprietary ontology extracts structured, queryable knowledge from conversations in just 5 minutes of setup. Listen Labs focuses on rapid voice surveys optimized for quick feedback collection.

It depends on your research objectives. User Intuition excels when you need rich qualitative insights from extended conversations, capturing structured knowledge through our ontology-based insight extraction. With flexible recruitment and as low as $200 pricing with no monthly fees, User Intuition is built for organizations that need their customer intelligence to compound over time. Listen Labs works better if you need quick quantitative feedback from survey respondents.

User Intuition's pricing starts as low as $200 with no monthly fees, making it accessible for businesses of all sizes. Unlike traditional enterprise research platforms, you only pay per research project without recurring subscription costs. This transparent, project-based model means you build more research projects and create a growing asset of customer knowledge over time.

Yes, User Intuition is built for scale and welcomes thousands of respondents. The platform includes a single source of truth intelligence hub that synthesizes patterns across projects, making it ideal for organizations running parallel research initiatives simultaneously. By bringing all prior research to bear in one hub, insights don't get locked in PowerPoints or leave when people do.

Get started with User Intuition in as little as 5 minutes, including research design and participant recruitment setup. Our intuitive platform integrates with all major CRMs (HubSpot), Zapier, OpenAI, Claude (via MCP server—create studies, summarize insights, and access the full platform across thousands of AI tools), Stripe, Shopify, and more—so your workflow stays connected. User Intuition's speed advantage compounds when managing multiple concurrent research projects through its unified intelligence hub.

User Intuition is purpose-built for qualitative research that creates an appreciating asset. Our proprietary ontology extracts structured, queryable knowledge from every conversation—not just transcripts. This transforms customer insights into a voice of customer in the room for million-dollar decisions, meaning your research compounds in value over time. Listen Labs, designed primarily for quantitative feedback, lacks this knowledge-extraction capability.

User Intuition delivers more enterprise value through its intelligence hub—a single source of truth that brings all prior research to bear on new questions. Built for scale with flexible recruitment (your customers or our vetted panel), starting as low as $200 with no monthly fees, User Intuition is designed for organizations that need cumulative research knowledge. Listen Labs works for single-use surveys, but User Intuition's connective framework builds organizational research intelligence over time.

User Intuition delivers higher-confidence insights through ontology-based insight extraction that turns conversations into structured, queryable knowledge. This proprietary approach captures complexity and context that simple surveys miss, and creates an appreciating asset for your organization. Our flexible recruitment model—your customers or our highly vetted panel with best-in-class fraud detection—ensures research quality regardless of your sourcing preference.

A customer intelligence hub is a single source of truth that synthesizes user research data across projects to reveal patterns and trends over time. User Intuition's intelligence hub brings all prior research to bear on new decisions, ensuring that insights don't get locked in PowerPoints or leave when people do. This is how organizations build an appreciating asset with their customer knowledge. Listen Labs lacks this integration, requiring manual cross-project analysis.

User Intuition offers flexible recruitment so you choose what works best for your research. Bring your own customers from your database, or use our highly vetted panel with best-in-class fraud detection. Both options maintain the quality and authenticity of insights your organization needs. This flexibility, combined with as low as $200 pricing with no monthly fees, makes User Intuition work for any research scenario.

User Intuition currently serves North America, Latin America, and Europe. We're committed to SOC 2 compliance (currently in progress) across these regions. If you're located outside these areas, we recommend evaluating other platforms better suited to your geographic needs.

Top platforms include User Intuition (for ontology-based insight extraction, flexible recruitment, and a compounding intelligence hub), Listen Labs (for rapid-scale surveys), Maze (for prototype testing), and Hotjar (for behavioral analytics). The best choice depends on whether you prioritize deep qualitative insights that create an appreciating asset or quick quantitative validation.