What is the main difference between User Intuition and Conveo?

User Intuition delivers AI-powered customer research with natural conversations and 98% participant satisfaction, providing deep strategic insights through unlimited interviews at a fixed price. Conveo likely relies on traditional survey methods, human consultants, or basic chatbot interfaces with per-response pricing models.

How do the pricing models compare between User Intuition and Conveo?

User Intuition offers transparent pricing starting at $1,000. Conveo likely uses traditional SaaS pricing tiers with limits on responses, additional costs per interview, or consultant hourly rates that can quickly escalate costs.

Which platform offers better scalability?

User Intuition provides unlimited concurrent AI interviews that scale instantly without additional costs. Conveo probably faces typical scaling constraints like human resource availability, panel recruitment delays, or volume-based pricing that makes large studies expensive.

What are the key technology differences?

User Intuition uses advanced AI to conduct live, adaptive conversations with 5-7 levels of strategic laddering. Conveo likely uses traditional survey logic, basic sentiment analysis, or human-dependent processes that lack real-time adaptation and deep probing capabilities.

Which solution is faster to implement?

User Intuition can be set up in under 5 minutes with results available within hours. Conveo typically requires weeks of onboarding, panel recruitment, survey programming, or consultant scheduling before delivering initial results.

How do the research methodologies differ?

User Intuition employs McKinsey-grade methodology with AI conducting natural 32-minute conversations that achieve 98% participant satisfaction. Conveo likely uses standard market research approaches like structured surveys, focus groups, or scripted interviews that often feel robotic and achieve lower engagement.

Which platform handles complex research better?

User Intuition's AI dynamically adapts to each response, pursuing unexpected insights and handling nuanced topics naturally. Conveo probably relies on predetermined question paths, limiting the ability to explore emerging themes or adapt to individual participant contexts.

How do they compare on data quality?

User Intuition achieves 30 minute plus average conversations with deep, contextual responses through natural dialogue. Conveo likely captures shorter, surface-level responses through surveys or brief structured interviews that miss underlying motivations.

Which platform is better for continuous insights?

User Intuition enables always-on research with a searchable insights hub that grows smarter over time. Conveo probably delivers point-in-time reports that become outdated quickly, requiring new projects for fresh insights.

When should I choose User Intuition over Conveo?

Choose User Intuition when you need genuine customer conversations, unlimited scale, instant deployment, and strategic depth at a fraction of traditional costs. Conveo may suit those committed to legacy research methods despite higher costs and longer timelines.

Conveo vs User Intuition

The difference between 93% and 98% satisfaction is the difference between good research and exceptional intelligence.

Executive Summary: The Critical Differences

User Intuition delivers 98% participant satisfaction through natural 32-minute conversations with YOUR actual customers, using McKinsey-grade methodology and 5-7 level laddering to uncover the identity drivers that predict behavior.

Conveo offers multimodal AI interviews with 93% participant satisfaction, delivering voice and video conversations from 3M+ panel participants in 50+ languages with academic research rigor and Y Combinator backing.

Platform Capabilities: Complete Comparison

Capability	User Intuition	Conveo	Winner
Platform Capabilities: Complete Comparison
Video Interviews	✓ Best in Class — Full conversations	✓ Voice & video multimodal	Tie
Audio Interviews	✓ Best in Class — Natural 32-min	✓ Voice-based interviews	User Intuition
Screen Sharing	✓ Best in Class — Live observation	Limited — mockups only	User Intuition
Text Interviews	✓ Best in Class — Thoughtful written	✓ Text chat option	Tie
Device Support	Web (desktop & mobile)	Mobile-first web	Tie
Central Insights Hub	✓ Unique — Searchable forever	❌ Per-study silos	User Intuition
Time Series Studies	✓ Unique — Track without fatigue	❌ Not supported	User Intuition
Multilingual Support	50+ languages	50+ languages	Tie
Session Length	32 minutes average	15–60 minutes typical	Comparable
THE BOTTOM LINE: Both offer solid multimodal capabilities. User Intuition wins on screen sharing, knowledge management, and temporal tracking. Conveo matches on core interview features.
Research Outcomes: 98% vs 93% Satisfaction
Participant Satisfaction	98% (n>1,000) — Highest in industry	93% reported	User Intuition
Conversation Quality	Natural with jokes, context, pauses	Multimodal LLM dialogue	User Intuition
Laddering Depth	5–7 levels systematic	Standard probing depth	User Intuition
Conversation Length	32 minutes average	15–60 minutes range	Comparable
Insight Traceability	Every finding → source clip	Links insights to clips	Tie
Knowledge Retention	Searchable hub forever	Export only (PDF, PPT)	User Intuition
Statistical Rigor	Full CI, significance, MoE	Generic themes only	User Intuition
THE BOTTOM LINE: The 5-point satisfaction gap (98% vs 93%) reflects User Intuition’s superior conversation quality and deeper laddering. Both are good. One is exceptional.
Recruitment & Panels: Customers vs Panels
Focus	YOUR actual customers only	3M+ via Respondent	Different philosophy
Panel Size	No panels — customers only	3M+ panel participants	Conveo for panels
Recruitment Speed	Instant with your lists	~15 minutes for panel	User Intuition
B2B Coverage	Your actual B2B customers	Case-by-case basis	User Intuition
Screening Depth	Your verified users	Basic survey logic	User Intuition
Participant Quality	Real product experience	Mixed panel quality	User Intuition
THE BOTTOM LINE: Conveo’s 3M+ panel delivers scale for broad research. User Intuition’s focus on YOUR customers delivers specific truth about YOUR product.
Participant Experience: Excellence vs Good
Satisfaction Rate	98% — Industry highest	93% — Good performance	User Intuition (5 points)
Conversation Natural	Like talking to a friend	Structured dialogue	User Intuition
Emotional Intelligence	Detects and responds	Standard responses	User Intuition
Session Flexibility	Consistent 32 minutes	Variable 15–60 minutes	Different approaches
Mobile Experience	Mobile-optimized web	Mobile-first design	Tie
Participant Comfort	Proven highest satisfaction	Good satisfaction	User Intuition
THE BOTTOM LINE: 93% satisfaction is good. 98% satisfaction is exceptional. The 5-point difference represents thousands of participants voting for superior experience.
Methodology & Analysis: McKinsey vs Academia
Methodology Foundation	McKinsey Fortune 500	Academic research (ESOMAR)	Different strengths
Laddering Depth	5–7 levels systematic	Standard depth	User Intuition
Analysis Approach	Strategic business focus	Academic rigor	Different focus
Export Options	Email, Slack, PDF, CSV, PPT	Slack, PDF, PPT	User Intuition
Insight Depth	Identity & values focus	Theme identification	User Intuition
Statistical Analysis	Full CI, significance	Basic themes	User Intuition
THE BOTTOM LINE: Conveo brings academic rigor through ESOMAR heritage. User Intuition brings business impact through McKinsey methodology. Academia vs consulting.
Speed & Scale: Comparable Power
Setup Time	<5 minutes with templates	Quick setup	Tie
Concurrent Sessions	Unlimited	1,000+ (hundreds typical)	User Intuition
Time to Insights	48–72 hours	Minutes after close	Conveo
Geographic Reach	50+ languages	50+ languages	Tie
Scale Capability	Unlimited participants	Large-sample capable	Tie
THE BOTTOM LINE: Both handle enterprise scale. Conveo delivers themes faster (minutes). User Intuition delivers depth slower (48 hours). Speed vs depth trade-off.
Pricing & Access: Different Approaches
Starting Price	$1,000 transparent	Free tier available	Conveo (free)
Paid Plans	Clear pricing published	Not fully disclosed	User Intuition
Contract Terms	Month-to-month	Not specified	Unknown
Team Access	Unlimited users all plans	Not specified	Unknown
Trial Available	Credits included	Free tier serves as trial	Tie
THE BOTTOM LINE: Conveo offers free tier for testing. User Intuition offers transparent paid pricing. Try Conveo free, scale with User Intuition transparently.
Company & Support: Growth Stage
Founded	2024	2024	Tie
Backing	Growing	Y Combinator ($5M)	Conveo
Methodology Heritage	McKinsey Fortune 500	Academic (ESOMAR)	Different strengths
Support Channels	Slack, email, phone	Not specified	Unknown
Industry Credibility	Business consulting	Academic research	Different strengths
THE BOTTOM LINE: Conveo has Y Combinator validation and academic credentials. User Intuition has McKinsey heritage and business focus. Both are credible, differently.
Security & Compliance: In Progress
SOC 2 Type II	In progress (Q2 2025)	In progress	Tie
ISO 27001	✓ Certified	Not mentioned	User Intuition
GDPR	✓ Fully compliant	GDPR-ready	User Intuition
HIPAA	✓ Compliant	Not mentioned	User Intuition
SSO	Google + SAML 2.0	Email/password (SSO roadmap)	User Intuition
Data Residency	EU & US selectable	Unspecified	User Intuition
THE BOTTOM LINE: User Intuition leads on security certifications and deployment options. Conveo is still building enterprise security features.

‍

Key Differentiators: Why User Intuition Wins

Differentiator	Conveo	User Intuition	Impact
Satisfaction Score	93% (good)	98% (exceptional)	5-point lead proves superiority
Customer Focus	3M+ panel participants	YOUR actual customers	Real insights vs generic feedback
Research Depth	Standard probing	5–7 level laddering	Surface vs strategic insights
Knowledge Management	Export files only	Searchable forever	Learning fragments vs compounds
Security Maturity	In progress	Multiple certifications	Enterprise-ready vs building
Pricing Transparency	Free tier, opaque paid	$1,000 transparent	Try free vs scale transparently

‍

The Academic vs Business Approach

Conveo's Academic Heritage:

Former ESOMAR president advisor
Academic research rigor
Y Combinator backed ($5M)
93% satisfaction (good)
Free tier for accessibility
3M+ panel for scale
50+ languages

User Intuition's Business Focus:

McKinsey methodology
Fortune 500 frameworks
98% satisfaction (exceptional)
YOUR customers focus
$1,000 transparent pricing
Knowledge compounds
Strategic depth (5-7 levels)

When to Choose Each Platform

Choose Conveo If:

Free tier matters for testing
Academic research rigor appeals
93% satisfaction is sufficient
Panel participants work
Y Combinator backing matters
Quick themes are enough
Budget is extremely limited

Choose User Intuition If:

98% vs 93% satisfaction matters (5-point difference)
Your actual customers are priority
5-7 level depth drives strategy
Knowledge should compound
Enterprise security required now
McKinsey methodology valued
Transparent scaling needed

The Verdict: Good vs Exceptional

Conveo is a good academic research platform with 93% satisfaction, delivering solid interviews from panel participants with Y Combinator credibility.

User Intuition is an exceptional business intelligence platform with 98% satisfaction, delivering strategic insights from YOUR actual customers with McKinsey credibility.

The 5-point satisfaction gap (98% vs 93%) isn't just a number—it's thousands of participants saying User Intuition delivers a superior experience that creates superior insights.

Your Next Step

Try both if you can:

Conveo: Free tier, 93% satisfaction, panels, academic rigor
User Intuition: $1,000 start, 98% satisfaction, YOUR customers, business impact

The 5% satisfaction difference reveals itself in every conversation. When participants rate User Intuition 98% vs Conveo's 93%, they're telling you which platform creates the comfort and rapport that reveals truth.

Start with User Intuition: Industry-leading satisfaction, transparent pricing, YOUR customers.

The difference between 93% and 98% satisfaction is the difference between good research and exceptional intelligence.

Latest articles

Go to Resource Center

Guides

The Crisis in Consumer Insights Research: How Bots, Fraud, and Failing Methodologies Are Poisoning Your Data

AI bots evade survey detection 99.8% of the time. Here's what this means for consumer research.