Research Readouts Executives Believe: Narrative Over Noise

Transform executive research presentations from data dumps into compelling narratives that drive decisions and build trust.

The VP of Product leans back in her chair, three slides into your research presentation. Her laptop opens. Eyes drift to her phone. You've lost her—not because your research lacks rigor, but because your readout lacks narrative structure.

Research teams invest weeks conducting studies, analyzing patterns, and validating findings. Then they undermine everything with presentations that bury insights under methodology explanations, scatter findings across disconnected slides, and mistake comprehensiveness for clarity. The result: executives disengage, insights go unused, and research teams wonder why their recommendations never ship.

The problem isn't executive attention spans or organizational culture. It's presentation architecture. Executives process information differently than researchers, and readouts that ignore this cognitive reality fail regardless of research quality.

Why Traditional Research Readouts Fail

Most research presentations follow a structure inherited from academic papers: methodology first, findings second, implications last. This sequence makes sense for peer review but fails catastrophically in business contexts.

Academic training teaches researchers to establish credibility through methodological rigor before presenting findings. Business leaders operate under opposite cognitive priorities. They need to understand business implications immediately to determine whether the research warrants their attention. When presentations delay the